TLAXCALA تلاكسكالا Τλαξκάλα Тлакскала la red internacional de traductores por la diversidad lingüística le réseau international des traducteurs pour la diversité linguistique the international network of translators for linguistic diversity الشبكة العالمية للمترجمين من اجل التنويع اللغوي das internationale Übersetzernetzwerk für sprachliche Vielfalt a rede internacional de tradutores pela diversidade linguística la rete internazionale di traduttori per la diversità linguistica la xarxa internacional dels traductors per a la diversitat lingüística översättarnas internationella nätverk för språklig mångfald شبکه بین المللی مترجمین خواهان حفظ تنوع گویش το διεθνής δίκτυο των μεταφραστών για τη γλωσσική ποικιλία международная сеть переводчиков языкового разнообразия Aẓeḍḍa n yemsuqqlen i lmend n uṭṭuqqet n yilsawen dilsel çeşitlilik için uluslararası çevirmen ağı

 07/03/2021 Tlaxcala, the international network of translators for linguistic diversity Tlaxcala's Manifesto  
EDITORIALS & OP-EDS / Why we should rejoice at Holocaust deniers, not suppress them
Date of publication at Tlaxcala: 22/10/2020
Translations available: Français  Italiano 

Why we should rejoice at Holocaust deniers, not suppress them

Norman Finkelstein


A Reply to Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg and Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey

Facebook and Twitter have announced that they will ban Holocaust denial from their platforms. In a forthcoming book, Cancel Culture, Academic Freedom, and Me, Norman Finkelstein argues that Holocaust denial should be taught in university and preferably by a Holocaust denier. Here’s an excerpt from his manuscript.

It would make a mockery of truth and academic freedom (it is said) if a university granted Holocaust deniers a platform. But, to begin with, it’s not obvious what exactly is being denied. Does the Nazi holocaust denote the extermination of European Jewry or all categories of people systematically put to and slated for death? If only Jews, then why? If the criterion is quantitative—fully 5-6 million Jews perished—why then does the Nazi holocaust enjoy a privileged status, such that it can’t be called into question?

Some 30 million Russians were killed during World War II, yet no red flags preempt free-wheeling debate of this lethal destruction. Further, if the singularity of the Nazi holocaust and the point at issue resides in the number killed, it’s hard to figure why a taboo would be placed on Holocaust denial. Isn’t the sensible thing simply to present the technical evidence for the widely accepted 5-6 million figure? But maybe it’s the qualitative criterion of how that distinguishes the Nazi extermination: that is, the industrial-style/factory-like/assembly-line process culminating in the gas chambers.

However, only half of those Jews who died were killed in death camps,1 while Raul Hilberg, who homed in on the “destruction process” in his monumental study, nonetheless brackets the Nazi holocaust with the Rwandan genocide (“History had repeated itself”), although the latter was executed utilizing the most primitive of weapons.2 Still, if the point of contention is the technique, why not then just let the evidence of gas chambers speak for itself? If the intended effect of the taboo on Holocaust denial is to suppress it, the actual effect is to arouse suspicion: why are deniers being muzzled if the evidence incontrovertibly belies their claims? Indeed, the taboo can boomerang in more ways than one.  


Courtesy of Norman Finkelstein
Publication date of original article: 21/10/2020
URL of this page :


Tags: Facebook Norman FinkelsteinHolocaust

Print this page
Print this page
Send this page
Send this page

 All Tlaxcala pages are protected under Copyleft.