TLAXCALA تلاكسكالا Τλαξκάλα Тлакскала la red internacional de traductores por la diversidad lingüística le réseau international des traducteurs pour la diversité linguistique the international network of translators for linguistic diversity الشبكة العالمية للمترجمين من اجل التنويع اللغوي das internationale Übersetzernetzwerk für sprachliche Vielfalt a rede internacional de tradutores pela diversidade linguística la rete internazionale di traduttori per la diversità linguistica la xarxa internacional dels traductors per a la diversitat lingüística översättarnas internationella nätverk för språklig mångfald شبکه بین المللی مترجمین خواهان حفظ تنوع گویش το διεθνής δίκτυο των μεταφραστών για τη γλωσσική ποικιλία международная сеть переводчиков языкового разнообразия Aẓeḍḍa n yemsuqqlen i lmend n uṭṭuqqet n yilsawen dilsel çeşitlilik için uluslararası çevirmen ağı la internacia reto de tradukistoj por la lingva diverso

 22/06/2018 Tlaxcala, the international network of translators for linguistic diversity Tlaxcala's Manifesto  
UMMA / Kemalist Turkey is dead
Date of publication at Tlaxcala: 19/07/2016
Original: Кемалистская Турция умерла

Kemalist Turkey is dead

Dmitry Evstafyev Дмитрий Евстафьев

Translated by  J.Hawk


Kemalist Turkey is dead. Even if Erdogan manages to survive (I think his position is deteriorating and the inevitable purge/slaughter will only worsen matters), it will no longer exist. The army, in the sense that it used to be the backbone of the Turkish state, is also dead.

Therefore the Turkish military might be able to slap together some sort of a putsch which just might succeed through sheer luck (though the likelihood of something like that is small, it’s more likely future putsches would be spearheaded by foreign PMCs), but what would be the point?

We must start getting ready for the new Turkey. We used to think the new Turkey would be neo-Ottoman (the second issue of the Ottoman Empire, as I wrote earlier), but now I think it will be something very different.

Something entirely different.

The neo-Ottoman Turkey was supposed to be relatively strong, relatively secular, comparatively pro-Western, and with a relatively strong economic growth. Right now, not a single of these four elements exists in full measure. There’s only…remnants, illusions, dreams of the past.

From here on out, things will only get worse.

The problem that in “turning to the people for help” and scattering the army and humiliating it, old man Erdogan has become dependent on this very same “Turkish street”…This dependence will only increase just as the economy is turning in a less-than-stellar performance.

The “street”, having had its fun at the expense of what used to be the most powerful army in the region (one should hope we understand that currently Turkey is absolutely defenseless–which naturally activates the Kurdish problem) and having tasted blood, it will demand a share of power for itself. That’s just how it is: if you don’t want to be friends with the Janissaries, you have to bow before the “street.” There are no more Sufis…The Sufis jumped the ship–the sat quietly like a mouse during the whole coup, which is very telling.

Now, what about the “sultan”…
Well, if Erdogan carries out a veritable “night of long knives” on his “field commanders”, that which one could get away with in Germany would have a very different outcome in the narrow alleys of Istanbul.

Neo-Ottomanism is a model. A model attractive to the outside world. That’s the only source of its viability.

Can reliance on “the street” be attractive, using Ilkham Aliev’s model? Here I have my doubts. His father did a lot to ensure the “energy of the masses” was, to quite Esenin, “set in concrete.” That’s some pun I came up with.

As far as we, Russian and others (neighbors, region, world, ultimately) are concerned, what does a relatively weak Turkey (I doubt anyone will contest that assumption? Particularly since Turkey has no prospect for improvement, even if we provide our shoulder for support), with growing street radicalism?

Where the military’s place will be taken by citizens personally loyal to Erdogan who have, to put it bluntly, have spent the last five years in close contact with the contingent we are currently bombing?

Where the “proper level of loyalty” will be ensured by ruling party political overseers? How could it be otherwise? Does it not remind one of anything?

I can’t fully formulate my prediction. I think it’s necessary, though.

The current situation is interesting indeed: yes, in a tactical sense, Russia came out ahead mainly because it made no rash moves (of course, it hardly made any sense for Russia to make any rash moves). But in the strategic sense, we are about to face other and more menacing challenges than those from the era when Turkey was a base for US missiles.

That’s how it is going to be…

Courtesy of South Front
Publication date of original article: 16/07/2016
URL of this page :


Tags: Recep Tayyip Erdoğan

Print this page
Print this page
Send this page
Send this page

 All Tlaxcala pages are protected under Copyleft.